Promises and Pitfalls of the “Research-to-Policy-Pipeline” Process - CONCEPT Professional Training
Policymaking is complex and incorporates many factors and voices. Rigorous empirical evidence
Mandatory reporters’ knowledge, perception, and trust in Title IX - CONCEPT Professional Training
As a resident assistant (RA), a mandatory reporting role under Title IX,
Why Do Forensic Experts Disagree? Suggestions for Policy and Practice Changes - CONCEPT Professional Training
Unreliable opinions can result in arbitrary or unjust legal outcomes for forensic
Does normative data represent the norm with respect to justice-involved men? - CONCEPT Professional Training
Justice-involved men appear to represent a distinct neuropsychological population. This is the
Conducting competent research on competency and sanity - CONCEPT Professional Training
Incorporating combined competency to stand trial (CST) and mental state at the
Contextual information influences lineup identification statements - CONCEPT Professional Training
People readily incorporate contextual information into their interpretations of witnesses’ verbal expressions
Counterfactual thinking influences individual’s support for crime control theater policies
Manipulations that promoted counterfactual thinking led mock jurors to be more certain
The Influence of Intuition on Legal Decision-Making
There is a surprising correspondence between the law and laypeople’s intuitive judgments.
Evaluators Do Not Always Uphold Culturally Competent Practice Guidelines
Self-reported culturally competent practices among evaluators suggest that evaluators do not always
Gender Equality is an Inequality in Risk Assessment
PCRA strongly predicts arrests for both genders, but overestimates women’s likelihood of
Are forensic judgments susceptible to biases derived from social stereotypes?
Criminal stereotypes are a potential source of bias in forensic evidence analysis
Presentation of Prosecutorial Theories to Explain Contradictory Evidence May Lead to an Overreliance on Confession Evidence Despite the Presence of Exculpatory DNA
Confession evidence can trump exculpatory DNA when prosecutors present theories to reconcile
