2 Hours | 2 CEs
This on-demand professional training program on U.S. Supreme Court Decisions Relevant to Forensic Practice: A 30-Year Update is presented by Christopher Slobogin, JD, LLM.
This program covers significant Supreme Court cases from the 1990s through the present, including its competency cases (e.g., Godinez v. Moran, Indiana v. Edwards; Panetti v. Quarterman), its medication cases (Riggins v. Nevada; Sell v. United States), its decisions about mental state defenses (e.g., Clark v. Arizona, Kansas v. Kahler), and its decisions about the death penalty (e.g., Atkins v. Virginia) and sexually violent predators (e.g., Kansas v. Hendricks). The focus is on the implications of these decisions for forensic evaluators.
Intended Audience
This on-demand professional training program is intended for mental health and other allied professionals
Experience Level
This on-demand professional training program is appropriate for beginner, intermediate, and advanced level clinicians.
CE / CPD Credit
APA, ASWB, CPA, NBCC Click here for state and other regional board approvals.
Learning Objectives
Upon completion of this program you will be able to:
Describe supreme court competency & medication cases
Describe supreme court decisions about mental state defenses
Describe supreme court decisions about the death penalty and sexually violent predators
Describe the implications of these decisions for forensic evaluators.
Curriculum
1. Introduction
2. Decisional Competence
3. Competence to Represent Self
4. Commitment and Treatment of Those Found Incompetent
5. Diminished Capacity and the Insanity Defense
6. Capital Punishment
7. Sex Offender Commitment
8. Risk Assessment
Develop a Specialty Area of Practice
Transforming mental health professionals into experts
Expert Instructors
Professional training developed and delivered by the field's leading experts
CE Credit
Earn CE credit for meaningful professional training that will elevate your practice
Convenience & Flexibility
Learn at your own pace, from wherever you might be!