This self-paced online professional training program on Report Writing for Forensic Evaluations is presented by Dr. Randy Otto. It focuses on conducting well-constructed forensic psychological evaluations and how it is not enough to persuade judges, attorneys, and other referral sources. Examiners must also be able to effectively communicate what data they considered, what actions they took, and the opinions they formed and underlying reasoning. Because psychologists, in most cases, do not testify about their work, reports and affidavits are the vehicles they must use. Research on forensic examiners’ report-writing practices is reviewed; how forensic practice guidelines, the ethics code, and rules of evidence and procedure shape reports is considered; principles for the organization and structure of forensic reports are identified; elements of good (and bad) reports are highlighted using multiple examples. More focused matters such as the use of jargon; specificity in word choice; identifying sources of information; distinguishing between observation and inference; and common report writing errors are considered, as well. Finally, preparation of affidavits, and how their structure and substance differs from reports, is tackled.
The fee for this training program is $250 and includes all materials and worksheets. Participants should expect to commit approximately 10 CE hours to complete this training program. In addition, case studies and other case-relevant materials are provided for training purposes. Throughout the training program, there are quizzes that must be passed with a 70% in order to advance in the course. Once the course is completed participants will complete a course evaluation and then will be able to print their certificate of completion.
This Report Writing for Forensic Evaluation is relevant for professionals who want to obtain or strengthen skills in report writing; including those involved in civil and criminal forensic mental health assessment, forensic inpatient, human resources social services, community settings, and those who work at the intersection of clinical psychology and law. This training program is for beginner, intermediate, and advanced level clinicians.
Upon completion of this course, participants should be able to:
– Describe the primary purposes of reports and affidavits that summarize their forensic evaluations
– Describe the different functions of reports and affidavits
– Describe common legal requirements of reports summarizing forensic psychological examinations
– Describe APA’s ethics code and forensic practice guidelines shape reports summarizing forensic psychological evaluations
– Describe 3 reasons to include competing hypotheses, disconfirmatory data, and alternative explanations in their reports
– Practice writing reports that distinguish case facts and their inferences and opinions
– Describe 2 ways to describe psychological test results in their reports
– Describe definitions for various psychological constructs using language that is understandable to a lay audience and
– Describe common report writing errors
About Dr. Randy Otto
Dr. Randy Otto is a licensed psychologist and is board certified in clinical psychology and forensic psychology (ABPP). He has been a faculty member at the University of South Florida since 1989. Although his primary appointment is in the Department of Mental Health Law and Policy, he also teaches in the Departments of Psychology, Criminology, and Rehabilitation and Mental Health Counseling.
Dr. Otto’s work focuses on the involvement of mental health professionals in the legal system. In 2007, he joined USF colleagues John Petrila and Norm Poythress as a contributor to the third edition of Psychological Evaluations for the Courts: A Handbook for Mental Health Professional and Lawyers. In 2013, the Handbook of Forensic Psychology, which he edited with Irv Weiner, was published. In 2014, with Rick DeMier and Marc Boccaccini, he published a book on expert testimony and report writing, Forensic Reports and testimony: A Guide to Effective Communication for Psychologist and Psychiatrists.
Dr. Otto has been on the editorial boards of a number of journals, and has served as President of the American Psychology-Law Society and the American Board of Forensic Psychology. He is current President of the American Board of Professional Psychology.
Dr. Otto chaired the committee that revised the APA Specialty Guidelines for Forensic Psychology and he also served on the American Bar Association Task Force that revised that organization’s Criminal Justice Mental Health Standards. He is a fellow of the American Psychological Association and he has received awards for his professional contributions from the Society for Personality Assessment, the American Academy of Forensic Psychology, the New York State Psychological Association, and the University of California-San Francisco.
When not at work or with his family, he is likely to be found on a motorcycle or at a casino (testing risk and probability theory).
This course is designed for all mental health professionals who wants to learn Report Writing in Forensic Evaluations. This course is an excellent means of strengthening skills related to report writing.
Participants will learn about conducting well-constructed forensic psychological evaluations and how it is not enough to persuade judges, attorneys, and other referral sources
– Brief audience survey
– Select references
– Common Errors
– Purposes and rationales
Participants will learn about identifying sources of information; distinguishing between observation and inference; and common report writing errors.
– Report formats
– Report logistics
– Report reviews
– Report Writing Exercises
– Affidavits and interrogatories
– Affidavit and interrogatory reviews
“This is an excellent course and has really made me think about the jargon I use, dis-complication, and the audience for which the report is intended. Thank you.” – Correctional Psychologist (PhD)
“The information is very useful and Dr. Otto is an excellent speaker. The course touches on the misuse of information that could have damaging effects to the defendant, which was very informative” – Social Worker (LCSW)
“The program and delivery are excellent. The course was excellent and I have gained knowledge from the information. I will take additional courses.” – Forensic Psychologist (PsyD)
Continuing Education Credit
This Distance Learning Course is a Home Study Training Program. To earn CE’s, you will have to complete the course quizzes and evaluation for this Home Study Distance Learning Course. No partial credit is available. For this course, you will need to pass the course quizzes with 70% correct and complete a course evaluation form to earn the certificate. You can take the test as many times as necessary to pass. Participants will earn 10 CE hours for completion once they have completed these requirements. Each participant will be able to print their CE certificate immediately after completing and passing the post-test and evaluation.
Your satisfaction with your Programs, Products or Services is important to us. However, because upon registration and payment for our Programs, Products, and Services, they are promptly made available to you, we do not issue refunds. Should you find that a particular Program, Product or Service is not the right fit for you, we will gladly assist you and provide access to another of our currently offered Programs, Products or Services of an equal price that might better suit you, provided that you contact us through our Website contact form or send an e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org explaining why you seek a substitute Program, Product or Service.
If you would like to file a grievance, go to www.ConCEPT-ce.com and read our Grievance Policy. Then, you can file a grievance on our Contact page. You can also send a written grievance to:
Consolidated Continuing Education & Professional Training (CONCEPT)
5668 FishHawk Crossing Blvd, #306 Lithia, FL 33547
Group Training Inquiries
Please submit your inquiry below and we will get in touch to schedule a call to discuss your group training needs.